Thoracic radiography remains the first-line imaging modality for evaluating canine cardiac disease in veterinary practice. Clinical signs such as coughing, exercise intolerance, tachypnea, or a newly detected murmur often prompt thoracic radiographs, which may reveal cardiac enlargement (cardiomegaly) or pulmonary changes consistent with congestive heart failure.

Before vertebral measurements such as VHS and VLAS are applied, thoracic radiographs should first be assessed as a whole. A structured visual review of the cardiac silhouette, trachea, great vessels, and pulmonary vasculature often reveals important clues to chamber enlargement and cardiac disease, even before formal measurements are made. This is especially useful in general practice, where the first question is often not the exact number, but whether the heart looks normal, mildly enlarged, or clearly abnormal.

In some cases, cardiac disease is identified incidentally during imaging performed for unrelated reasons such as trauma or pre-anesthetic screening.

Interpreting thoracic radiographs requires a structured approach. Radiographs can demonstrate overall heart size, chamber enlargement patterns, pulmonary vascular changes, and evidence of pulmonary edema or pleural effusion. However, they cannot assess cardiac function, which requires echocardiography.

This article focuses on how to interpret thoracic radiographs in dogs with suspected heart disease, including vertebral heart score (VHS), vertebral left atrial size (VLAS), pulmonary patterns, and when echocardiography is required for definitive diagnosis.

Accurate interpretation of cardiac disease on thoracic radiographs depends on a solid understanding of normal cardiac anatomy. Recognizing the expected position and contour of the cardiac chambers and great vessels allows clinicians to identify subtle deviations that indicate underlying disease. Without this foundation, early or mild abnormalities—particularly chamber-specific enlargement, can be easily overlooked.

Heart Chambers
Heart Chambers: RA – right atrium, LA(blue & green) – left atrium, LA(pink) – left auricle, RV – right ventricle, LV – left ventricle, AA – aortic arch, PT – main pulmonary trunk

Cardiac Enlargement on Radiographs

Recognizing an enlarged heart in dogs is the first step in diagnosing cardiac disease.

Radiographic assessment includes:

  • Cardiac silhouette size
  • Shape and contour
  • Chamber-specific enlargement

Cardiomegaly may reflect:

  • Mitral valve disease
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy
  • Pericardial effusion

Radiographs can allow differentiation between mild enlargement and advanced disease, especially when pulmonary edema is present.

Even before formal measurements are made, radiographs can provide useful evidence of chamber enlargement through contour changes, tracheal displacement, and focal bulging in expected chamber locations. These visual findings are often what first raise suspicion, while VHS and VLAS help quantify the impression and support serial monitoring over time.

Right-sided cardiomegaly

Radiographic Patterns: MVD vs DCM vs Pericardial Effusion

Mitral Valve Disease (MVD)

  • Left atrial enlargement
  • Left ventricular enlargement
Left-sided cardiomegaly with left atrial enlargement

Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)

  • Generalized cardiomegaly 
  • Chamber specific enlargement (specifically left atrial enlargement) can also be seen 
  • In severe cases this can appear globoid
Suspected Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Pericardial Effusion

  • Globoid “basketball heart” / Rounded heart on all images
Globoid heart

Evaluating the Canine Heart on Radiographs Before VHS and VLAS

Thoracic radiographs should never be reduced to measurement alone. Before calculating VHS or VLAS, the cardiac silhouette should be assessed visually using a consistent approach. This allows identification of chamber enlargement, contour abnormalities, and secondary signs of cardiac disease that often provide the first indication of pathology.

A practical visual assessment includes:

  • Overall cardiac silhouette size
  • Shape and contour of the heart
  • Tracheal position
  • Left atrial region
  • Great vessels
  • Pulmonary vessels and lung pattern

Findings that may help localize chamber enlargement:

Left-sided enlargement

  • Straightening of caudal cardiac border
  • Dorsal tracheal deviation
  • Increased opacity in the region of the left atrium
  • Left auricular bulge (VD/DV)

Right-sided enlargement

  • Increased sternal contact
  • Rounding of cranial cardiac border
  • Broadening of the right heart margin

These subjective findings are often apparent before measurements are performed and should guide interpretation. VHS and VLAS provide objective support but should not replace visual assessment.

Measuring Vertebral Heart Score (VHS)

The canine vertebral heart score is a  widely used method to quantify cardiac size on radiographs, and can be used to monitor changes in cardiovascular structures over time, helping assess progression of heart disease.

Step-by-Step VHS Measurement

  1. Obtain a  well collimated and well positioned right lateral thoracic radiograph. Significant obliquity of the radiograph can substantially affect the accuracy of this measurement.
  2. Measure the long axis:
    • From base of the carina to cardiac apex
  3. Measure the short axis:
    • Perpendicular to long axis at widest point
  4. Transfer both measurements to vertebrae starting at T4
  5. Add values

Final value = vertebral heart score (VHS)

vertebral heart score measurement in dogs using long and short cardiac axes referenced to T4.
Step-by-step vertebral heart score measurement in dogs using long and short cardiac axes referenced to T4.

Normal VHS Ranges

  • Dogs: 8.7–10.7 vertebrae
  • Mean: ~9.7
  • 10.7 → cardiomegaly

Breed Variation

Studies show a significantly higher VHS in toy and brachiocephalic breeds risking over diagnosis if standard references are used. 

Breed Variation in Canine Vertebral Heart Score (VHS)

BreedMean VHS (± SD)Comparison to Standard (9.7 ± 0.5)Clinical NoteReference
Mixed breed (reference)9.7 ± 0.5BaselineOriginal reference populationBuchanan & Bücheler, 1995
Pug~10.5–11.0↑ HigherRisk of false positive cardiomegalyLamb et al., 2001; Jepsen-Grant et al., 2013
English Bulldog~10.5–11.0↑ HigherVertebral anomalies commonLamb et al., 2001
Boston Terrier~10.3–10.8↑ HigherBrachycephalic conformationLamb et al., 2001
Pomeranian~10.7 ± 0.6↑ HigherToy breed variationKim et al., 2018
Toy Poodle~9.9 ± 0.6Slightly ↑Overlaps normal rangeKim et al., 2018
Brittany Spaniel~10.6 ± 0.2↑ HigherBreed-specific reference recommendedBavegems et al., 2005
Dachshund~9.5–10.0VariableInfluenced by body conditionJepsen-Grant et al., 2013
Beagle~10.0–10.5↑ Slightly higherMild upward shiftGugjoo et al., 2013

Common Errors

Overestimation:

  • Oblique positioning
  • Including fat or fluid
  • Incorrect axis placement
  • Cardiac cycle
  • Variation in measurements between readers
  • Variation in vertebra size (hemivertebra)

Underestimation:

  • Poor inspiration
  • Incorrect T4 identification
  • Does not directly include the left atrium

CAUTION:

As discussed above, numerous factors can influence VHS measurements, and the wide variation reported in the normal range limits its consistency and reliability. Therefore, VHS should not be used as the sole metric to determine cardiac enlargement.

VLAS — Assessing Left Atrial Enlargement

The vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) is used to help detect left atrial enlargement in dogs

  1. How to Measure VLAS (VLAS Measurement Technique)
  2. View: Use a right or left lateral thoracic radiograph (centered on the heart).
  3. Measure: Start at the center of the ventral margin of the carina and extend the line to the caudal edge of the left atrium, where it intersects the dorsal border of the caudal vena cava.
  4. Transfer to vertebrae starting at T4
  5. Record value
VLAS measurement demonstrating the line from the carina to the dorsal border of the caudal vena cava at the caudal aspect of the left atrium.
VLAS measurement demonstrating the line from the carina to the dorsal border of the caudal vena cava at the caudal aspect of the left atrium.

Normal Values

  • Normal: 1.4–2.2 v
  • 2.3 v → enlargement

Breed Variation 


Breeds with Higher or Wider VLAS Ranges

BreedVLAS (Mean ± SD / Range)Type of VariationReference
Pomeranian2.17 ± 0.26↑ Higher mean + wider spreadKim JH et al. (2018).
Toy Poodle2.02 ± 0.15↑ Slightly higher meanKim JH et al. (2018).
Maltese2.03 ± 0.17 (IQR ~1.8–2.1)↑ Slightly higher meanKim JH et al. (2018);
Chihuahua~1.8 ± 0.2 (range ~1.3–2.1)Wider rangeHezzell MJ et al. (2020).
Miniature Australian Shepherd~1.7–2.5↑ Wider range (higher upper limit)Baisan RA et al. (2025).
American Eskimo~1.7–2.4↑ Wider rangeBaisan RA et al. (2025).
Tibetan Terrier~1.7–2.3Slightly wider rangeBaisan RA et al. (2025).
Border Terrier~1.7–2.3Slightly wider rangeBaisan RA et al. (2025).

Clinical Relevance

VLAS is a useful tool when evaluating and monitoring mitral valve disease:

  • Early enlargement → monitoring: by repeating radiographs in 9-12 months.
  • Significant enlargement → consider treatment

Pulmonary Changes in Cardiac Disease

Radiographs are essential for detecting pulmonary edema in dogs and CHF.

Pulmonary Venous Congestion

  • Typically done by comparing the diameter of the pulmonary veins to the accompanying arteries and adjacent ribs (4th rib on lateral radiographs and 9th on VD image
  • Veins larger than accompanying artery are suggestive of venous congestion
  • Veins larger to their adjacent ribs at the point of intersection with these ribs are suggestive of venous congestion
  • Both arteries and veins can be enlarged together suggestive of volume overload/congestion

Pulmonary Edema

  • Interstitial pattern which can coalesce into an alveolar pattern
  • Perihilar and caudodorsal distribution in dogs (feline patients can have a more random distribution)

Progression

Normal → congestion → interstitial → alveolar

Radiographic progression of pulmonary edema in dogs with congestive heart failure.
Radiographic progression of pulmonary edema in dogs with congestive heart failure.

When Radiographs Are Enough vs When Echocardiography Is Required

Radiographs are useful for:

  • Identifying moderate to severe enlarged heart in dogs
  • Detecting pulmonary edema
  • Monitoring response to treatment of CHF
  • Monitor progression of known cardiac disease

Echocardiography is required for:

  • Valve assessment
  • Cardiac function
  • Definitive diagnosis
  • Evaluating for comorbidities such as pulmonary hypertension, cardiac mass and thrombi
  • Fever of unknown origin

AI-Assisted VHS and VLAS Measurement

Measuring VHS and VLAS manually can introduce variability between clinicians.

AI-assisted tools can:

  • Automatically calculate VHS and VLAS
  • Standardize cardiac measurements

SignalPET helps clinicians evaluate thoracic radiographs more consistently, reducing variability between readers

Thoracic radiographs remain a cornerstone in evaluating the cardiac silhouette allowing veterinarians to detect cardiomegaly, assess pulmonary changes, and guide clinical decision-making.

VHS provides a standardized measure of overall heart size, while VLAS improves detection of left atrial enlargement. Although useful tools to monitor progression of cardiac disease, blind reliance on these measurements should be avoided. 

However, radiographs have limitations. When detailed functional assessment or definitive diagnosis is required, echocardiography remains essential.

Early detection, consistent measurement, and appropriate escalation to advanced imaging are key to improving outcomes in canine cardiac disease.

FAQ

Normal VHS ranges from 8.7 to 10.7 depending on breed.

VLAS measures left atrial size and helps detect early heart disease.

They detect structural changes, but echocardiography confirms diagnosis.

About the Author

DVM, MS, DACVR

Dr. Jack Hamersky is a board-certified veterinary radiologist and a Diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Radiology. He earned his DVM from Iowa State University in 2016, completed a rotating internship at VCA Aurora Animal Hospital near Chicago, and pursued a diagnostic imaging residency at Auburn University, where he also obtained his MS degree. Dr. Hamersky achieved board certification in 2021.

Book a Demo

SignalPET helps you bring real diagnostic support to the cases that would otherwise get no second opinion, with three layers of clinical support